TOPEKA — Social workers across the country have voiced strong concerns about the National Association of Social Workers (NASW), calling for accountability and transparency after a recent structural reorganization that resulted in the dismissal of 14 state-level leaders. In November, NASW announced this realignment, prompting widespread discontent within its state chapters. In South Dakota, the local chapter's board informed members about allegations of 'harmful dynamics' at the national office, highlighting issues related to questionable spending and a consolidation of power. The board expressed serious concerns regarding governance and ethical practices within the organization and encouraged members to reach out to NASW’s national board to request a vote of no confidence in CEO Anthony Estreet. Estreet, who took on the role in 2023 after serving on the board, has faced criticism from multiple state chapters. A letter from the Michigan NASW chapter stated their unanimous vote of no confidence, citing a lack of integrity, transparency, and accountability from NASW leadership. Other states, including Rhode Island, Kansas, Kentucky, and Texas, echoed similar sentiments, demanding clarity on the restructuring decisions and a thorough external investigation. The unrest has also led to an increase in online discussions and the formation of social media accounts aimed at investigating NASW. LaToya Evans, an external communications expert for NASW, stated that an investigation is not planned and emphasized the absence of concrete evidence of financial mismanagement. In October, NASW’s treasurer acknowledged receiving complaints regarding sensitive organizational issues. The NASW board has committed to reviewing these concerns and ensuring fiduciary responsibilities are upheld. Despite assurances of clean audits from an independent accounting firm, many members remain skeptical about the organization’s financial transparency. The recent restructuring, which combines several state chapters under single leadership, was described by Evans as a necessary move for modernization and financial stability. However, leaders from the affected states argue that the consolidation undermines their ability to effectively represent local interests. As the situation evolves, NASW members continue to demand clearer communication and accountability from their national organization.