Republican legislators in Utah have repeatedly indicated their intention to appeal a judge's decision that invalidated the state's previous congressional district boundaries. The ruling required lawmakers to create a new map for congressional districts. However, the revised map proposed by the legislature was also rejected by the same judge, leading to questions about the next steps for GOP legislators. The judge has expressed curiosity regarding the lack of appeal from the legislators, who have been vocal about their discontent with the court's rulings. As of now, there has been no official announcement or indication of when or if an appeal will be filed. The situation has left many observers wondering about the GOP's strategy moving forward, especially in light of the upcoming election cycles. The redistricting process is critical, as it can significantly impact political representation and electoral outcomes in the state. The implications of the judge's decisions may also affect voter engagement and party dynamics in Utah. Republican leaders have yet to provide a clear explanation for their inaction, despite the urgency of the matter. The state has a history of contentious redistricting battles, and this case is no exception. As the deadline for finalizing congressional maps approaches, the pressure is mounting for GOP legislators to make a decision. In the past, similar situations have led to significant political repercussions, and many are closely monitoring how this will unfold. Stakeholders from various political backgrounds are advocating for a fair and transparent redistricting process, which they believe is essential for maintaining the integrity of the electoral system. The ongoing developments in this case will likely be pivotal for both the Republican Party and the voters of Utah as they prepare for future elections.