Utah state representatives Katy Hall and John Johnson recently addressed concerns surrounding the implications of HB261, a law aimed at diversity, equity, and inclusion on university campuses. During a discussion at Weber State University, both lawmakers emphasized that the intention of the legislation was not to restrict free speech among students and faculty. The controversy arose as some individuals interpreted the law as a potential limitation on open discourse within academic settings. Hall and Johnson clarified that the primary focus of HB261 is to foster an environment that promotes diversity and inclusion without infringing on the rights of individuals to express their opinions. In their statements, the lawmakers pointed out that many misconceptions about the law have circulated since its introduction. They reiterated that the legislation is designed to enhance the educational experience by ensuring that all voices are heard and respected on campus. Hall noted that public universities are institutions where a variety of viewpoints should coexist. She stated that the law should not be viewed as a barrier to free expression but rather as a framework to support constructive dialogue among students. Johnson added that it is crucial for educational institutions to uphold the values of free speech while also being sensitive to issues of equity and inclusion. He expressed his commitment to finding a balance that allows for the open exchange of ideas while promoting a respectful community. The discussion at Weber State comes amid a broader national conversation about the role of diversity and inclusion initiatives in higher education. Many universities are grappling with how to implement such programs without compromising the fundamental principle of free speech. Both Hall and Johnson expressed their hope that the clarification regarding HB261 will ease concerns and encourage more productive conversations about diversity and free expression on campuses across Utah.