Judge Approves Release of Hearing Transcript in Robinson Murder Case
Judge Graf has ruled to release a transcript in the Tyler Robinson case while redacting some security details.

A hearing was held on Monday regarding media access to the case against Tyler Robinson, who is accused of the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Fourth District Court Judge Tony Graf ruled that a transcript from an October hearing would be made public, following requests from various news media outlets, including FOX 13 News. However, parts of the transcript that discussed security measures related to Tyler Robinson's court appearances will be redacted.
Judge Graf emphasized the public's presumptive right to access court records, although he noted that this right is not absolute. He denied a request from the defense to seal other sections of the hearing transcript, ruling that some information had already been disclosed by prosecutors in charging documents or during news conferences.
Moreover, Judge Graf dismissed a motion from news media outlets to be granted intervenor status in the case, which would have required the court to notify them of any intent to close hearings or seal records. Instead, he instructed prosecutors and defense attorneys to provide notice if a closed hearing is scheduled. News media outlets will need to monitor the public docket for any legal motions that may restrict camera access in the courtroom and file their objections within seven days.
Robinson's attorneys have indicated plans to request a ban on cameras during future hearings. The charges against Robinson include aggravated murder for the fatal shooting of Kirk on September 10 at Utah Valley University in Orem, with prosecutors intending to pursue the death penalty.
Media presence in Utah court hearings is typically limited, as judges often allow only one photographer and one videographer to document proceedings, sharing images with other news organizations. Additional journalists and members of the public can attend to listen and take notes.
In recent filings, it was noted that open courts help maintain the integrity of the judicial process and enhance public confidence. Historically, criminal cases in the U.S. have been accessible to the public, supporting the notion that fair trials can occur without limiting the press's ability to inform the public.